I think that this was a very interesting case which was, infact, started from something small and got way too out of hand. I think that the case was not so much about a one minute statement read every, in every science class, the real point was to see if ID was a science which of course it is not. The case should have been much simpler and much more about wether a one minute sentence should be read or not. I think that the trail was just a big waste of time and money, this is because the teachers and the schoolboard could probably have solved this in a much simpler fashion. I think that ID should not be tought in a classroom as a science, but it should be tought as a contradicting side to science. It should be tought because science has many gaps, which this theory does not, I believe that every student should be able to make up their mind about their belief system. On the other side religion is not a science and should not be tought in a science classroom, this is what some other people. Eventhough I agree with that I think that every public school should have the one minute statement read to the kids, and every kid should decide. Now I also think that it would be a good idea that not every kid should have to learn evolution, I think that every school should read the statement and that each school should have two classes one that teaches the evolution theory and one that teaches creationism.

Overall I think that ID should not be in a science classroom, however every cud should get to pick which theory they want to learn. Do they want to learn creationism or evolution. And every public school should have a classroom that teaches evolution and one that teaches creationism.